Brookfield Renewable Partners LP (BEP) Q3 2024 Earnings Call Highlights: Record FFO and Strategic Growth Initiatives

Brookfield Renewable Partners LP (BEP) reports strong financial performance and strategic advancements amid market challenges.

Author's Avatar
Nov 09, 2024
Summary
  • Funds from Operations (FFO): $278 million for the quarter, or $0.42 per unit, up 11% year-over-year.
  • Asset Monetizations: Generated approximately $2.3 billion of proceeds, with returns of 2.5 times invested capital and IRRs greater than 20%.
  • Equity Deployment: Over $11 billion committed and deployed into growth year-to-date.
  • Available Liquidity: $4.6 billion at the end of the quarter.
  • Hydroelectric Contracts: Executed two contracts with US utilities at almost $90 per megawatt hour for an average duration of 15 years.
  • Financing Activities: Expected to execute a total of $30 billion in financing this year, generating $700 million in total financings.
Article's Main Image

Release Date: November 08, 2024

For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

Positive Points

  • Brookfield Renewable Partners LP (BEP, Financial) delivered record funds from operations for the third quarter, benefiting from asset development, recent acquisitions, and strong all-in pricing.
  • The company has a diversified business across attractive power markets globally, focusing on low-cost mature technologies.
  • BEP has a robust investment pipeline, with a 200,000-megawatt renewable power project development pipeline, 90% of which is located in top data center markets globally.
  • The company successfully generated approximately $2.3 billion from asset monetizations, achieving returns of 2.5 times the invested capital and IRRs greater than 20%.
  • BEP's balance sheet is strong, ending the quarter with $4.6 billion of available liquidity, supporting its growth activities.

Negative Points

  • The market for large businesses with ongoing capital needs for development and construction is experiencing a scarcity of capital.
  • There is uncertainty regarding potential regulatory or subsidy changes, particularly in the US, which could impact future growth.
  • The offshore wind sector has faced challenges with long lead times between capital outlays for development and project commissioning.
  • Some investors are concerned about the impact of potential policy changes on tax credits and subsidies, which could affect project returns.
  • The company faces competition in the renewable energy sector, which could impact its ability to secure favorable contracts and partnerships.

Q & A Highlights

Q: Can you provide more detailed thoughts on the US return profile and growth potential if tax credits are changed or repealed?
A: Connor Teskey, CEO: Government support and regulatory processes generally have strong bipartisan support, so any changes are not expected to be material. Our business is focused on corporate demand and low-cost energy production, not government subsidies, ensuring resilience against regulatory changes. We are the low-cost producer of a critical commodity, positioning us strongly for growth in the US.

Q: Can you speak to larger growth aspirations in offshore wind, given the recent Ãrsted transaction?
A: Connor Teskey, CEO: We are bullish on offshore wind, viewing it as a large, fast-growing asset class. The Ãrsted transaction is a strategic partnership with a global leader in offshore wind. We see more attractive opportunities in offshore wind today than in the past five or six years and hope for more growth in this area.

Q: How do you view the impact of potential changes to US tax policy on different asset classes?
A: Connor Teskey, CEO: Onshore wind and solar are the cheapest forms of electricity production. If tax subsidies are reduced, we can adjust PPA prices to preserve returns. Our focus on low-cost technologies ensures insulation from regulatory changes. Higher-cost sectors reliant on subsidies may be more exposed.

Q: Are you seeing more opportunities to deploy capital in undervalued companies or projects following the US elections?
A: Connor Teskey, CEO: Our investment pipeline remains robust. Volatility in share prices may reduce access to capital for some, creating opportunities for us. We expect to deploy increasing amounts of capital into growth, driven by demand for our product and our well-positioned business model.

Q: What is your view on the impact of the US election outcome on the Westinghouse nuclear business?
A: Connor Teskey, CEO: The election outcome is positive for Westinghouse. The business benefits from growth in nuclear through its core services and new reactor technologies. Westinghouse's SMR technology, the AP300, is well-positioned for growth, complementing our renewable offerings to large corporate clients.

For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.